Undermajordomo Minor: Patrick deWitt stays weird


Publication date: September 5, 2015
My rating: ?? out of 5 stars
Read this if you like: Dark comedy, dark fairy tales, darkness, happy endings
Check out Undermajordomo Minor on Goodreads
Thanks to: House of Anansi Press for the review copy and CJ for the “in.”

Patrick deWitt writes some weird shit. His writing has been described as dark, intense, grim, poetic, bold, and funny. Undermajordomo Minor is all of those things, but also nothing like his previous two novels, Ablutions and The Sisters Brothers. The covers all look the same, and the title plays with opposites in the same way The Sisters Brothers did (brother/sister, major/minor) but if you are expecting The Sisters Brothers set in a castle, or Ablutions with a butler rather than a bartender, hoo boy, you better sit down.

You may have heard a few things about Undermajordomo Minor. Did you hear about the thing with the rat? Did you hear about the thing with the cake (actually a tart, but I first heard about it as “that cake fucking scene”?) I heard those things and thought, oh yeah. Classic deWitt. Remember those weird “intermissions” in The Sisters Brothers, where some dream-like stuff happens and you were like “huh?” but it all kind of added to the atmosphere and general quirkiness of the story, so you let it slide? Remember the awful sex scene in Ablutions (not that one, the other one,) and you were like “ew,” but it seemed to fit with the general seediness and debauchery and so you let that slide, too? The rat thing and the tart thing are not like that. They do not let you make excuses or assumptions, they make you stop and say “what the fuck did I just read?” And there are other things like those things too. Unlike the first two books, Undermajordomo Minor doesn’t give you much of a foothold before throwing you into the weird.

Undermajordomo Minor does not lend itself to assumptions about authorial intentions, either. With the first two novels, it’s pretty easy to come up with deWitt’s purpose – not that you’d be right, necessarily, but it’s pretty easy to say that yes, wasn’t The Sisters Brothers a wonderful subversion of genre fiction? Didn’t you love his fresh take on the traditional Western? And it’s easy to think that Ablutions was autobiographical, a portrait of the artist as a young bartender, a novelist being born, literally “notes for a novel.” But Undermajordomo Minor? Here are some of my half-baked ideas about what deWitt is “doing” here:

  • Erotica satire? The terrible sex scene was VERY reminiscent of The Claiming of Sleeping Beauty by Anne Rice, in general because it was brutal and weird, but also specifically in the vague old-timey setting and the suggestion of some confusing social order which is never explained.
  • A fractured fairy tale? I tried and failed to find a fairy tale that had a moral like “never say you’re bored”. On page 7, Lucy laments his “paltry life” and says all he wants is for “something to happen” and well, something happens alright. Back to Sleeping Beauty, the fairy tale, perhaps it’s more a “careful what you wish for” moral, as the King and Queen wish for a child, without thinking about what trouble that child is going to bring. Lucy similarly can’t conceive of what “something to happen” will mean for him.
  • If not fairy tales, maybe Russian literature? Something keeps nagging at me about a Gogol short story I read a while back, “The Night Before Christmas.” I revisited it, and didn’t find many direct parallels, except for the overwhelming sense of weirdness. Apparently, Nabokov said Gogol “was a strange creature, but genius is always strange,” which could be said of deWitt too.
  • Comment on modernism or postmodernism? The epigraph is a quote from a short story called Balloon Journey by Robert Walser, “It is a very painful thing, having to part company with what torments you. And how mute the world is!” It took some doing to find anything about this story, but Walser was a noted modernist who influenced Kafka, among others. Is Undermajordomo Minor so weird because it’s somehow gone beyond postmodernism and back around again to modernism? Postpostmoderism? I don’t pretend to know enough about literary movements to say, and hope someone smarter than me can illuminate.

I have no clue what deWitt is going for with Undermajordomo Minor, and that’s a pretty rare thing. Contrast this with Franzen, say, where you know exactly what things he’s commenting on, because they’re the things he always comments on.



I don’t know where I’d classify this book. I don’t know who I’d recommend it to. I don’t know how many stars to give it. I know that I enjoyed the reading experience, which is not the same as “liking” the book. I know that the ending made me smile and I still think about it. The ending didn’t provide closure, quite the opposite; when I think of Lucy now, he is still on a journey, and still on the best part of a journey, still anticipating, and I still think something (else) is going to happen when he arrives.





  1. ryandejonghe

    This is a bloody fantastic review! I’ve got the book to take with me on a trip and will post the review upon my return. I’ve got another copy to use for a giveaway (yay, internet). Now everyone can take in the literary joy of rats and tarts. (Now, how do I save this review so I can link to it later?)

  2. Naomi

    I agree with the guy above – this is a great review. It makes me want to read the book and not read the book at the same time. That must be exactly what you were going for, right?

  3. Elle

    Good heavens, what a review! I always love how intelligently you discuss the significance or function of specific events in a novel. Again, makes me want to both read it and…not read it. (I am extremely fascinated by “the tart thing”–is it like the watermelon sex scene in Suttree?)

  4. Carole Besharah

    Ha! Fun review. I loved his last book. Glad he’s keeping it weird. I’ll let you know what I think once I’ve read it. Cheers!

  5. Pingback: Edmonton blog roundup: Sept. 7, 2015 | Seen and Heard in Edmonton
  6. The Paperback Princess

    This really is such a solid review for a book that you still don’t know how to feel about. Reviewing a book with so many blanks is the hardest thing to do – kudos to you. I kind of think that I still really want to read this.

  7. The Cue Card

    It sounds too bizarro. But I guess he’s coming to Wordfest right? Then he could read those scenes aloud … the tart and the rat scene. Hmm

  8. Pingback: Fall 2015 Preview Part II: Local Reads and CanLit | Reading in Bed
  9. TJ @ MyBookStrings

    I wanted to read this just because of the title (and because I still haven’t read The Sisters Brothers), but now I REALLY want to read this! Sometimes, you just need a little “weird shit.” 🙂

  10. Pingback: Review: Undermajordomo Minor by Patrick DeWitt – You may get squeamish, but what the hell—it’s worth it! | Ryan's Book Review
  11. Pingback: 2015 Year in Review #2: Best Books | Reading in Bed
  12. Jen

    My favorite collection of short stories is The Tsar of Love and Techno by Anthony Marra. It’s a series of interconnected stories set in Russia that spans the second world war to present day. As soon as I finished it, I wanted to start it again from the beginning. I recommend it to everyone.

  13. Pingback: Canadian Books on the International Dublin Award Longlist 2017 – Consumed by Ink

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s